Miracast vs WiDi: The Development and Evolution of Wireless Screen Mirroring Technology
In the development history of wireless display technology, both WiDi and Miracast have played important roles. This article will compare and analyze these two technologies, helping you understand the evolution of mobile screen mirroring technology and why Miracast has become the mainstream choice.
WiDi: Early Exploration Led by Intel
Key characteristics of WiDi technology:
-
Developed primarily by Intel.
-
Required specific hardware support.
-
Primarily limited to the Intel platform.
-
Configuration was relatively complex.
Miracast: Establishment of an Industry Standard
Technical advantages of Miracast:
-
Industry standard protocol.
-
Wider device support.
-
Simplified connection process.
-
Continuous technical updates.
Technical Comparison Analysis
-
Compatibility: Miracast > WiDi
-
Ease of Use: Miracast > WiDi
-
Performance: Both are comparable.
-
Device Support: Miracast > WiDi
The transition from WiDi to Miracast reflects the trend in wireless display technology from proprietary solutions to open standards. For mobile screen mirroring users, Miracast offers a better user experience and a wider range of choices.